Consumers say they care about animal welfare, ethical sourcing and responsible production. But how much does that concern actually influence what ends up in the basket?
Already a subscriber? Log in to download
About this report
Not everyone who cares will act. Consumers may support higher welfare or responsible sourcing in principle, yet still choose differently when faced with a higher price, limited availability or a product that does not deliver on the fundamentals. The report challenges brands to look beyond headline ethical sentiment and ask a more commercially important question: who is actually prepared to change their behaviour, and what will make them do it? The cost of getting the proposition wrong goes beyond missed sales. Brands risk investing behind ethical attitudes that do not convert, creating premiums consumers will not accept, or relying on claims that fail to build trust. The report highlights the growing importance of credibility, and the consequences when responsible sourcing is communicated without sufficient evidence or relevance.
FMCG brands, food and beverage manufacturers, dairy and protein companies, foodservice operators, retailers, sustainability and ESG leaders, marketing and commercial teams, category and product managers, innovation teams, procurement and sourcing specialists, packaging and communications teams, R&D functions and senior decision-makers shaping product propositions, responsible sourcing strategies and future growth opportunities.